#8 Summer 2026

Italy: Combining Fiduciary Mandates and Life Insurance Solutions

Filippo Mancini Senior Wealth Planner Italy View profile

For Italian clients, an insurance-based wealth solution rarely operates in isolation. In practice, it is often combined with other structures that support administration, coordination and overall wealth organisation.

Among the most established of these is the Italian fiduciary mandate. When paired with an international insurance solution, it can introduce an additional layer of administrative simplicity, consolidation and oversight.

Understanding The Fiduciary Structure

The Italian fiduciary company (Società Fiduciaria) is a long-established structure, regulated since Law no. 1966 of 1939 and operating under ministerial authorisation.

Its defining feature is the separation between formal and effective ownership of an asset. The client (fiduciante) transfers formal ownership of an asset to the fiduciary company, which administers it in its own name but exclusively on the client’s behalf and instructions. The client always remains the ultimate owner.

An Evolving Role

Historically, fiduciary arrangements were often associated with confidentiality. However, this function has progressively diminished over time as transparency and reporting obligations have increased.

Today, their role has shifted towards wealth coordination. A fiduciary company can act as a central point for managing a family’s assets, applying appropriate tax treatment and consolidating reporting.

In this respect, the modern fiduciary company increasingly performs functions similar to those of a family office. This is where the combination with an insurance solution becomes particularly relevant.

Supporting Tax Administration

One of the clearest areas where an insurance solution and fiduciary company complement each other is tax administration.

Where an international insurer acts as a withholding agent (sostituto d’imposta), taxation is applied at source and the client’s obligations are largely fulfilled.

Where this is not the case, the responsibility would normally fall on the individual. In this context, a resident fiduciary company can step into this role: by holding the policy under mandate, it can act as withholding agent itself, apply the relevant tax treatment, manage cash flows linked to premiums and surrenders and ensure compliance with local rules.

An additional benefit is that, where an international policy is held through a fiduciary mandate, the client may be relieved of annual foreign asset-reporting obligations, (the well-known “Quadro RW”), consolidating a range of tax and reporting obligations within a single, professionally managed relationship.

An Alternative to Trust-Based Structures

The fiduciary mandate may also represent a domestic alternative to a trust.

The two are fundamentally different. A trust involves a transfer of assets to a trustee, who becomes their legal owner and holds them as a separate patrimony. Under a fiduciary mandate, ownership remains with the client.

For families seeking coordination, administration and oversight without the transfer of ownership and the foreign law considerations or costs typically associated with a trust, a fiduciary mandate combined with an insurance solution can achieve many of the same practical benefits through a familiar, domestically regulated structure.

A Question of Flexibility

For advisers, the key consideration is flexibility.

A life insurance policy may be held directly by the client or through a fiduciary mandate, depending on the client’s priorities around administration, consolidation and the wider coordination of their wealth.

Neither approach is inherently superior. The value lies in the ability to select the structure that best aligns with the client’s entire wealth.

As Italian fiduciary companies continue to evolve towards a model more closely aligned with that of a family office, their combination with international insurance solutions is likely to feature more often in conversations between wealth managers and their clients, reflecting the complementary strengths of the two arrangements.

Key Takeaways for Advisers

  • Use fiduciary mandates to complement insurance solutions: They can enhance coordination, oversight and administrative efficiency.
  • Assess tax administration responsibilities: A fiduciary may act as withholding agent where the insurer does not, simplifying client obligations.
  • Reduce reporting complexity where appropriate: Holding policies through a fiduciary structure may streamline foreign asset reporting requirements.
  • Consider fiduciary mandates alongside trusts: They offer a domestic alternative where full transfer of ownership is not required.
  • Focus on structural optionality: The ability to combine or separate these tools allows solutions to be tailored to broader client objectives.