#5 Autumn 2025

France: Mitigating French Exit Tax: The Role of Life Insurance in International Mobility

Benjamin Fiorino Wealth Planner / Tax and Legal Counsel, France and Monaco View profile

The French Exit Tax can represent a significant challenge for internationally mobile clients with substantial investment portfolios.

By investing through an insurance-based wealth solution from the outset, clients can mitigate this key tax consequence associated with potential mobility – noting that UHNW individuals change jurisdiction on average three times in their lifetime. The key lies in the legal distinction between direct ownership of securities and the policyholder’s creditor claim under an insurance contract.

Why It Matters Now

Global mobility among high‑net‑worth (HNW) and ultra‑high‑net‑worth (UHNW) clients continues to rise. Moves to attractive destinations such as Portugal, Italy, or Switzerland remain common, but often trigger complex tax consequences.

The French Exit Tax, designed to capture unrealised gains when residents leave France, can create liquidity pressure and reduce cross‑border flexibility.

Understanding this risk, and the strategies available to alleviate it, is essential to preserving client assets and trust.

Who Is in Scope

The Exit Tax applies to individuals who:

  • Have been French tax residents for at least six of the 10 years prior to departure; and
  • Hold either:
    • Financial assets exceeding €800,000, or
    • At least 50% of the rights in a company.

What Becomes Taxable at Departure

  • Unrealised capital gains on securities
  • Earn-out rights
  • Deferred or suspended capital gains

Tax is either payable immediately or subject to deferral, depending on the destination country and applicable rules.

Planning With Insurance‑Based Wealth Solutions

A crucial distinction exists in French tax law:

  • Directly held securities fall within the scope of the Exit Tax.
  • Policyholder claims under a life insurance policy do not.

When a client invests cash into a unit-linked life insurance contract and builds their portfolio within it, the assets are owned by the insurer and not directly by the client. Instead, the policyholder holds a personal claim (créance) against the insurer.

Because French tax law does not include such claims in the Exit Tax base, assets held within the insurance contract are outside the scope. This can significantly reduce the client’s exposure when leaving France.

Case Study

Two individuals, both French tax residents for 10 years, each hold a €5 million portfolio with a 30% latent gain (€1.5 million). Both intend to relocate to Dubai, United Arab Emirates, to finish their careers before retiring in Portugal.

Individual 1 – Holds a Direct Portfolio Holding at the time of leaving France

  • Exit Tax applies on the €1.5 million gain.
  • Using an illustrative 30% flat tax, the immediate liability would be €450,000 at departure.
  • Deferral may be available but can require guarantees and ongoing reporting.
  • Enforcement risks may persist after relocation.

Individual 2 – Has invested through a Life Insurance Contract from the outset

  • The investment was originally made in cash, and the portfolio is now structured within the life insurance policy.
  • At exit, the client holds a creditor claim against the insurer, not the securities themselves.
  • No Exit Tax applies on the €1.5 million latent gain.
  • The policy continues to grow in a tax‑deferred environment, with benefits for wealth transmission and international portability.

Outcome

The insurance‑based approach helps the client avoid an immediate €450,000 tax charge while maintaining investment flexibility and long‑term planning advantages.

Beyond Exit Tax: Additional Benefits to Consider

  • Tax efficiency: Continued deferral of gains and flexibility in reallocating investments.
  • Estate planning: Ability to design beneficiary clauses tailored to family needs.
  • Cross-border portability: Recognition across Europe and compatibility with international private banking.
  • Compliance assurance: Transparent and legally robust, reducing the risk of requalification or challenge.

Key Takeaways for Advisers

  • Review clients’ portfolios proactively well in advance of any potential relocation, if there is a possibility that such a move might one day be considered.
  • Identify potential Exit Tax exposure early, especially where significant unrealised gains exist.
  • Use the planning window as an opportunity to address wider needs: succession, cross-border mobility, and investment flexibility.